korrasera:

lines-and-edges:

jayalaw:

quixylvre:

sleepwithgiggli:

xenoqueer:

starfox-64:

brandonsgame:

curlyhumility:

greater-than-the-sword:

thivus:

antonnizhny:

Hello, welcome to hell

this is legitimately a scene from Brave New World

No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no

I thought we left this psuedo-psychology in the 60s, shelved away with Frued. So, uh, because this apparently needs to be said:

COCSA (child on child sexual abuse) is a thing and a form of CSA, it is differentiated from “playing doctor” in by actual genital stimulation, as is being suggested

An adult permitting COCSA is sexual abuse

An adult exposing a minor to pornography is sexual abuse and grooming behavior

Exposure to pornography is one reason, second to having been molested, that a child will initiate sexually abusing another child

I WANT A BULLET PUT IN THE HEAD OF WHOMEVER THOUGHT THIS WAS HEALTHY AND GOOD.

THIS IS JUST LETTING MORE CHILD PORN BE DISTRIBUTED BEFORE OUR VERY EYES AND MORE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO START ACCEPTING IT UNTIL IT BECOMES LEGAL.

Amazing to see tumblr unironically cite an extreme right “news” website with a reputation for being Christian propaganda rather than news, and act like that’s a real and genuine take.

And by amazing, I mean, “well, at least this time people are being relatively straightforward that they prefer evangelical propaganda to actual scientific resources on child development and safety.”

The actual research group, University of California Santa Barbara’s SexInfo, simply contains resources for educating teenagers about safer sex, consent, dating, dysphoria and dysmorphia, and similar topics. Information about sexuality among children focuses almost exclusively on identifying sexual violence, with a few resources on how to educate your children on sexual development, and what kinds of behaviours are typical among developing children, including how to allow those behaviours safely and without having those children be at risk of, you know, fucking rape.

But, you know, by all means tumblr, buy into the evangelical fantasy that the entire western world is a modern gomorrah rife with child sex slavery and ready to be burned by the cleansing fires of god.

That surely hasn’t even been used as a way to oppress and fucking murder people, and definitely never caused thousands of children to develop severe mental illnesses and oh yeah, to lack the words to describe being fucking raped so that they are unable to get help or protection. /sarcasm

Being antisexualist gets children hurt, and this kind of alarmist, anti-science claptrap is exactly how

reblogging for the debunking. I had such a feeling of bafflement as I read the first few replies, wondering why people were accepting this at face value. Then I remembered the hysteria that always accompanies the combination of the word “children” and “sex” even when the latter is part of the phrase “sex education”.

please stop spreading reich-wing propaganda

Debunking time!

Additionally: I didn’t notice until now that if you go to OP’s blog they’re a literal Nazi, but indeed that is the case! Most of the first several commenters also declare right-wing affiliation in their bios.

Reblogging for the debunk and analysis of fascists spreading around bullshit.

eulaliasims:

skitzofreak:

brainstatic:

If Democrats take the House, their current ranking member of the Financial Services Committee becomes the chair of the committee, and has the power to subpoena Trump’s bank records. That member is Maxine Waters. Vote.

REGISTER TO VOTE

OR REGISTER HERE

YOU MUST BE REGISTERED AHEAD OF TIME BEFORE YOU CAN SHOW UP TO VOTE!!

Your periodic (almost daily at this point, lbr) non-sims reminder to Americans to PLEASE VOTE, remind your friends and family to vote, all those good things.

psiblue:

the-whovian-down-baker-street:

Millennials and Gen Z: Trump shows signs of being a genocidal dictator, we shouldn’t vote for him

Baby boomers: OOOOO Is your Safe Space being violated by his comments snowflake??? How AWFUL IT must be to have a REAL man for president instead of OoOoBamA

Trump, after being voted into office: *leaves the UN human rights council, puts hundreds of young children into prison camps and tent cities, takes away valuable items like rosaries similar to the removal of rings during the Holocaust, puts babies and toddlers into foster homes/orphanages, literally treats ACTUAL CHILDREN like prisoners for wanting a better life elsewhere*

Baby boomers: oh….oh no….

Millennials and Gen Z: *stare into the camera like they’re on the office*

bold of you to assume the boomers have reached the “oh no” point

The US Isn’t Just Separating Children From Their Parents. It Also Has No Plan For Reuniting Them.

zhora-salome:

They are even deporting parents without their children. They remain in the US and it will be difficult for the parents to even find them again, much less to get them back. 

Thousands of deeply traumatised children. This is child abuse. 

If you in any way think this is right or justified, get off my blog. 

The US Isn’t Just Separating Children From Their Parents. It Also Has No Plan For Reuniting Them.

karethdreams:

aupheling:

scrapbot13:

wheremyscalesslither:

gatorfisch:

murphysmom67:

niggazinmoscow:

It’s fucking prison camps holding 1,400 children. that’s fascism

This is incredibly difficult to look at. I fear this will continue and he will commit even worse crimes against humanity. I believe the UN is sitting on June 27 to discuss the humanitarian aspects of Trumps decisions here.

Glad to see major network coverage of this

So sorry that this isnt snakes but… wow.

The quotes with his face are in Spanish as well as English. This is a reeducation center.

Remove children from parental influence, hold them long enough for them to captor-bond for survival, surround them with a new ideology 24/7. The youngest ones become blank slates, and the older ones wear down and adapt just to belong.

The next step would be to with hold all contact from their parents indefinitely. You could then punish them for speaking or learning their native tongue, and teach them domestic and hard labor skills and “employ” them outside of the camps to [insert synonym for “it builds character” here]. Since they aren’t actually citizens, minimum wage and labor laws don’t apply to them.

Ask the Native Americans and Austriallian Aboriginals how well this system works.

You could also ask the First Nations in Canada.

And now there are rumblings that this administration is going to pull the US out of the UN Human Rights Council.

Autogynophilia pathologizes normal female behavior

tobitastic:

When I was first coming out as trans, I had a lot of internalized transmisogyny.  I knew how negative society’s images of trans women were and I was convinced that I was somehow different.  I was terrified of being seen as a man in a dress, so I just never wore dresses.  In that respect it was rather convenient that I’m butch.  I was not going to be – as another trans woman put it to me – “a masturbating freak in panties.” I internalized a list of norms and behaviors that I had to avoid in order to be taken seriously and seen as a real woman.  This list of “don’t"s is more or less the autogynophilia diagnostic citeria.

Years later, after I had begun writing on transmisogyny I still had a lot of these messages internalized.  I had a wake up moment when I was traveling and visiting a girlfriend.  Her roommate came home after a difficult day and mentioned that she had gone clothes shopping to cheer herself up, and quickly showed off her new underwear and dresses, in particular one slinky sequined number.  There was much oohing and aahing and her mood significantly improved.

About an hour later she came back out of her room and said that she was having a hard time doing her work for the evening because she was still depressed.  My girlfriend sat her down and gave her some sage advice.  "Just put you nice new dress on, as well as your fancy new underwear.  It will make you feel sexy and you’ll feel better.”  "Then what, just work while wearing it?“ “Yeah.”

Warnings had been popping into head the whole time but now alarm bells were going off.  I so desperately wanted to warn them “Don’t do that! You’re directly admitting a connection between feminine clothing and sexual arousal and using that almost as if you’re self medicating!  No one will take you seriously as a real woman, you’ll just be seen as some fetishist!”  But I didn’t say that of course.  Not only because it would have been very rude, but because they were cis women.  No one is going to take away their womanhood for feeling sexy about lingerie and slinky dresses.  This seems to be something cis women, particularly femmes, do all the time.

The bottom line is that the behavior classified as autogynophilia is normal female behavior.  Charles Moser did a small study where he tried applying the criteria for it to cis women and found that 93% of cis women qualify as autogynophiles. So why are trans women subjected to this standard and often stigmatized, punished, or denied access to healthcare if they fit this criteria?  And why is there no similar criteria for trans men?

It seems to me this is primarily about exerting the control doctors have over trans people to maintain male control over the sexuality of women. It encourages us to be sexually available to men and discourages us from having a sense of sexuality focused in ourselves or in other women. It sets up a pass/fail system so we are beholden to gatekeepers and must prove that we are the good kind of trans woman and not the bad kind.  And it pits us against each other as enforcers of this system and keeps us divide so we cannot challenge the psychologists who create the rules of who can and cannot access transition. It’s no accident that one of the main proponents of using autogynophelia as a diagnosis was caught having sex with his patients, not informing them he was using their experiences in his research, and manipulating their testimony by granting/denying medical care based on whether or not they said they fit his model.

solluxsucksdick:

funkies:

rumour:

is it true that girls have to be careful when they take baths because their vaginas can like swallow water or something and then get infected and then they can die or is that just a myth

did you take sex ed in texas

let me just say that i live in texas and in my sexual education a girl asked what the clitoris was and the teacher told her that it didn’t exist.