demigray:

bi-trans-alliance:

India declares freedom of sexual orientation a fundamental right

“India’s Supreme Court has issued a historic ruling confirming the right of the country’s LGBT people to express their sexuality without discrimination.

Judges ruled that sexual orientation is covered under clauses in the Indian Constitution that relate to liberty, despite the Government claiming there was no legal right to privacy.

The ruling paves the way for discriminatory practices against LGBT people to be challenged in the courts.”

(read more)

This is such a huge deal! It affects 1.3 billion people.

marauders4evr:

marauders4evr:

marauders4evr:

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK!?

NO SERIOUSLY WHAT THE FUCK!?

The United Nations proposed a law condemning nations who sentence people in the LGBT community, among other minorities, to death. 

And the U.S. voted against it.

They refused to condemn countries who SENTENCE THE LGBT COMMUNITY TO DEATH!

The United Nations isn’t one of those gray areas. All of the laws and legislations are intentionally black and white. In this case, you either condemn killing the LGBT community for the sake of being gay/trans/etc. Or you don’t. 

There’s no middle ground. There’s no interpretation. There’s no reading into it. 

On October 3rd, 2017, the United States refused to condemn sentencing the LGBT Community to death. Which can only mean that they’re in favor of sentencing the LGBT Community to death. 

revolutionarygays:

revolutionarygays:

revolutionarygays:

it kills me when ppl write articles about “straight” women wanting to hook up w women and they cite all of this scientific research about sexuality being “flexible” and talk about how “labels aren’t necessary” and the kinsey fucking scale without even once mentioning that maybe, just maybe, women want to date and marry men exclusively – despite being attracted to other women – because society has demonized, punished, and persecuted lesbian and bisexual women for centuries

this cosmopolitan article interviewed a handful of straight women who privately engage in sex with other women (without telling their boyfriend/husband, obviously) and these women just gushed about how much they love women and having sex w/ women but only wanted to date and marry men, and it’s like… i feel for these women, because they’re probably not even remotely straight, and they know deep down that dating and marrying men is socially acceptable which is why they cling to it despite many of the women openly reviling their boyfriend/husband – but at the same time, how much damage does this do to lesbian and bisexual women who are out? i mean, if these women are so comfortable with this setup, good for them – but these articles about “straight” women marketed to other straight women has got to push other potentially non-straight women back into the closet. in these articles these women deliberately distance themselves from lesbians and bisexual women and often do not want to hook up with women who identify as such, and also clarify that they do not want to sleep with butch or trans lesbians because they’re “too much like men”, which they find unattractive lmao

and it’s weird because the author seemed to imply that like, times were changing and etc etc and people are “more heteroflexible” now – as though that’s liberal and progressive and pro-gay – instead of realizing that a lot of these shifts are due to changes in the climate of the LGBT community and the strides forward we’ve made, and that articles essentially saying “you can love and fuck women and still be straight” can’t possibly be that progressive when out LGBT women are still being systematically oppressed, beaten, murdered, and mocked by society.

things are changing, sure, but they aren’t changing so fast you can pretend like introducing the concept of being “heteroflexible” or basically closeted for life like some Fun Hot Lifestyle to potentially questioning bi/lesbian women and call it progressive. it’s not. it’s still regressive and it’s some weird attempt by straight people to seem liberal and open-minded while still bending over backwards to not care about LGBT women – potentially closeted, closeted, or out – at all

and like, not to mention compulsory heterosexuality and internalized homophobia – which are the root of many questioning women’s problems – are borne from the fact that society is inherently homophobic and that being a lesbian or bisexual woman is something straight and even questioning women subconsciously consider to be “inferior” or “weird”. being straight and having sex with women is cool and feminist, but actually “being” bisexual or a lesbian is weird. your family will be uncomfortable and awkward about it anyways and your friends will judge you and men will treat you really weirdly, so why even open that can of worms?

internalized homophobia causes closeted people to hate themselves and other bi & lesbian women while denying their identity, and externalized homophobia makes sure they’re too scared to question those norms

writing articles that essentially glorify being closeted because “straight” women say it’s cool isn’t helping either of these issues

transkrem:

pearlcourse:

anhamirak:

irlpigmon:

transkrem:

Like, people who identify as Queer know the word is used like a slur. Trust me, we know.

So when we say “queer is a slur” was started by terfs, maybe use some critical thinking and try to understand what we mean. That is, if you actually care about queer people and the damage terfs do, rather that just screaming “queer is a slur!” and ignoring the actual point.

Terfs did not like that queer was reclaimed. End of. This is a fact. Queer was too broad, too accepting, and embraced all the people they wanted gone. And I know y’all exclusionists feel the same but get pissed when we point it out so you deny it, but sit down and listen for a minute.

Queer was the preferred term for poc. For bisexuals. For trans people. For people with multiple identities. It neatly encapsulated everything, and was a friendly community to those who felt thrown under the bus by mainstream LGBT activism. It was a political and social statement, “you treated my like I was different and weird, and guess what? I am and that’s something to be proud of.”

So the response? “You can’t use that word. Its bad. Its a slur.”

And at the time, a lot of people rolled their eyes. Everyone knew why they didn’t like the word and brushed that off. It was fine.

So they started more subtly. “Just so you know this word is very harmful and is a slur so be careful how you use it :))) in case you didn’t know :)))) its a slur :))) friendly reminder :))) for the sake of other people of course :))))” type shit on every post involving the word, including and especially posts simply mentioning self identification.

Always worded in friendly, concerned ways, like the derailment was meant to be nice and considerate, and not about normalizing their rhetoric.

And what happened because of that was a younger generation of community kids growing up with these statements being thrown at them and absorbed on every. Single. Post. That. Mentionioned. Queer.

The result? That same generation of kids cutting it all short, removing the meant-to-be-palatable niceness, to just say “queer is a slur.”

Exactly how it was originally intended. “Queer is a slur.” People drop on posts where young queer people talk about it being a self identifier that actually fits them. “Its a slur,” they comment, with nothing else, on posts they clearly didn’t read past that word, written by people twice their age who had reclaimed it before they were even born.

Its nasty. Its disgusting. It’s plain old bigotry, whether the people saying know it or not. It is a terf tactic, plain and simple.

And no one wants to deny that it is indeed used as a slur (right along with all the rest of our identities.) No one wants to be insensitive and force it on people who haven’t reclaimed it.

But invading queer people’s posts to spit “queer is a slur” is flat out queerphobic. You do the dirty work of terfs, of cis straight oppressors, by saying in one simple sentence: “its a dirty word, there is no pride in it, you haven’t/can’t reclaim(ed) it.”

And regardless of your actual intentions, when you do this, that is EXACTLY what you are communicating and doing.

“Queer is a slur” is a terf movement. Stop fucking supporting terfs just because you want to pretend like it isn’t.

Calling yourself queer is fine but like.. it’s not a good umbrella term bc it Is a slur and if you can reclaim it you can but lots of gay people are uncomfortable w it (including me, a trans woman) n u gotta respect that

“Gay” is a slur too. In fact I have never once in my life heard queer used as an insult, but I lost track of how many times I’ve heard gay used to way. And yet here you are using it as an umbrella term. In fact it’s used as an umbrella term constantly. And nobody says a word about it.

What’s the difference?

Rhetorical question. The difference is that there wasn’t a movement by terfs and similar exclusionists to make sure nobody could comfortably self-identify as gay. There was for queer, and sadly it worked on a lot of people.

I’m going to keep using it as an umbrella term. Because that’s what it is. Because it is actually the best umbrella term we’ve ever had. It sucks that so many people have been misled to the point where they’re uncomfortable hearing/reading the word queer. I won’t use it to refer to individuals unless they’ve indicated that they’re okay with that, because each person gets to choose their own labels. But for the community? It’s the most inclusive word I’ve got and I’m not letting exclusionists take it away. I’m going to keep fighting for the queer community, because it’s the only community that undeniably includes all of us.

The difference between Queer as a slur and Gay as a slur is the history behind the words. “Queer” means “weird”, whereas “gay” means “happy” in historical terms. Though both have been used as slurs, and both have been reclaimed, the reason why some people are uncomfortable with “Queer” as a catch-all term for the LGBT community is that history.

So when you refer to the LGBT community as “queer”, you’re saying that all LGBT people are “weird”. That’s why people, including me, are uncomfortable with it being a catch-all term for the community. For personal use, it’s fine, but for widespread, it’s got its problems that should be taken into consideration.

That’s actually not true. “Gay” in origin (as a label to call other people) meant “sexually perverse/deviant,” and was most prominently used on sex workers, as well as perceived gay and gnc(trans) people in the early 20th century. It was reclaimed in the exact same fashion as queer by gay men, as a purposeful distancing from the term “homosexual.”

There is actually a surviving letter written by a queer identifying person around that time discussing the shift of terms over to gay, and that not being something they liked because of the horrible connotations and it not being as good a term as queer (if I’m remembering correctly.)

The reclaiming process redefined these terms to an extent for us (though the “weirdness” was embraced as something to be proud of in the 90s, that was an important part.) but “gay” lost its negative connotations over time (though it was still hurled as a slur,) but queer was hung onto because gatekeeping bastards hated the fucking word and its inclusiveness and never let anyone forget it.

I feel just as bad when people call the community “the gay community” and yet an overwhelming amount do it. But I don’t rag on gay people who do it really because I know they use the terms comfortable to them. I also don’t hold it against people who use other terms that are more offensive but personally reclaimed, because I know they include only those who identify under that term.

When “queer community” or “queer people” is used, a) its no more offensive than any other term being blanketed, and b) it literally only includes queer people. Of you’re not queer identifying….it doesn’t include you.

Queer

is inherently a part of my identity. It makes me feel comfortable and home. Online I can identify as a polyamorous, pansexual, demisexual genderqueer leaning towards feminine but irl queer is a fine umbrella for all of that without having to be super specific.

Gay with Christian Parents?

gayontillmorning:

This is a list of Christian writers, pastors, and leaders, who believe that Jesus loves Gay people and Gay couples.

If you are being mistreated or ignored by Christian parents or Christian community, I recommend introducing them to the differing perspectives within their own religion.

1. Dr. David Gushee – “Changing our Mind”

2. Justin Lee – “Torn”

3. J.R. Daniel Kirk – look him up on YouTube or find his blog

5. Misty Irons – she’s not fully affirming, but she’s a good step forward for most conservatives – her blog is on point (also her key note speech from the Gay Christian Network Conference this past year (2016))

6. Tony and Peggy Campolo – Peggy has been an advocate and ally for years, Tony just became fully affirming (accepting). They are well-respected people

7. Matthew Vines – check out his book, blog, or his organization “The Reformation Project”

8. Dr. Throckmortan – if your parents are hung up on thinking you can change or that you can just become straight, have them check out Dr. Throckmortan’s recent blog posts on the topic. He’s still relatively conservative, but He’s a HUGE leap forward for many conservatives & I highly recommend his writing.

9. Julie Rogers – I highly recommend her blog and her recent writings. She is a lesbian woman who holds strongly to her faith, yet believes the God accepts and affirms gay couples.

10. Organizations: The Gay Christian Network. The Reformation Project. New Directions (Canada). PFLAG. Everyone is Gay.

11. Finally, these are a few people who are teaching a harmful message about the LGBT community – stay away from them – Christopher Yuan, Rosaria Butterfield, and Kegan Wesley (among others)

This list is an abbreviated version of a longer list that I created.

I hope that it comes in handy for anyone who struggles to integrate their faith and sexuality, or for those whose parents use faith to justify treating them badly.

If you need to talk or want me to give you more information or better resources that might address your specific questions or your parents’ specific fears, please feel free to send me a message.

Please reblog.

With love,
K