Corrective Rape- A South African Speaks

wickedwitchofthewhothehellcares:

Okay, I wasn’t going to do this, but it kept eating at me (and other people around me). So. Let it be known that I am a South African Bisexual cis female.

“Corrective rape was a term coined by South African lesbians! Thus this is a lesbian-only term!” is something that’s getting thrown around a lot by the Discourse Brigade. 

The first time I saw this I burst into laughter. I mean, I am the victim of corrective rape and never have I ever been told by any of my lesbian sisters to not use this term. It never occurred to anyone I know that I would not be able to use this term, or that this is not what my sexual assault was.

It was yet another example of how silly people could be. Were people who had never spoken to a single LGBT+ South African really going to be this ignorant? 

I never took it seriously for a second because, really? Surely nobody actually thought that South African Lesbians were gonna expect everyone to conform to some nebulously specific list of things to qualify to use the term “corrective rape”. 

But hey, as an African you get used to people talking over you and thinking you ride to school on a lion. Whatever, you laugh and you move on. 

But I couldn’t move on. 

Because people kept telling other people that they were, I don’t know, spitting on people’s graves, for using this term “incorrectly”. 

So let me tell you this right now: If your assault happened because you do not conform precisely to your society/culture’s cisheteronormative* values, congratulations! You get to use the term corrective rape. Compliments of your South African brethren. 

End. Of. Fucking. Discussion. 

Now- let me tell you why I couldn’t move on. 

Because the assholes that are policing the use of this term are spitting on the graves of every single one of my fucking ancestors. 

Allow me to explain. 

South Africa is a really unique place. Did you know we have eleven (11) official languages? That’s not including the minority ethnic groups that call my country home. 

Now, when you realise that you have nine (9) traditionally black South African cultures, two (2) white cultures, the Chinese people, the Indian people, Other Africans… You may begin to figure out we’re really fucking diverse. 

And we’re pretty proud of that diversity. Post Apartheid. 

Apartheid was a system built- at its core- on ‘us’ vs ‘them’. It wasn’t inclusive. It separated people. It put some people in positions of power over others. It redefined the term ‘gatekeeping’ (in my opinion).

It was really fucking nasty. 

It killed a lot of people. 

And then Nelson Mandela came along. You know the story- he was imprisoned and instead of hating everyone he taught love and inclusion (after Winnie Mandela got him freed whilst running the Struggle- go read up on her. She’s a true feminist icon). 

He is the father of our nation. And he taught us that hatred and bigotry and exclusion are never ever the way to go. 

Afrikaans is still an official language. Part of the old Afrikaans anthem is still included in our official anthem. 

We are taught that this is our country’s way forward. 

We’re the Rainbow Nation! 

LGBT+ people were granted every single right American LGBT+ people are still fighting for in our constitution in 1994. 

But unfortunately, this lead to a huge homophobic backlash. 

Thus- corrective rapes started happening all across the country. 

But! The assholes who rape people? They don’t ask whether you’re lesbian or gay. They don’t check your credentials. 

They can rape the girl who’s a little too ‘butch’ for their tastes, or the boy who might not play football (soccer for the Americans). 

They do not care if you are a card carrying member of the LGBT+! They care only for the fact that you don’t look masculine/feminine enough. That you might have been staring at a boy/girl. That you said no earlier. Maybe you have a LGBT+ friend, so obviously you’re the same. Or hell, maybe your parents know you’re LGBT+ and they pay someone to rape it out of you. Maybe your arranged husband does it on your wedding night. 

They do not care how you do not conform to societal standards- only that you do not. 

And in South Africa we know this. 

We know that no one’s rape is exactly the same as anyone else’s. Because it could never be exactly the same. 

So yeah, here a completely straight white girl could use the term “corrective rape” and no one, no one, would bat an eyelash. Because she was correctively raped. 

Because we know that united we stand, but divided we fall. And we have fallen so very very far in our past. 

So no. 

You do not get to fucking gatekeep this term which my brothers and sisters and I in this struggle have shed our blood and tears in. 

You do not get to exclude people in our name.

Not when we freely gave this term to the world to use as and if needed.

Kindly respect us and our culture enough to not spit directly into our and our forefathers faces. 

*I’m so sorry Trans Tumblr. I couldn’t find another word that really worked here. 

** Yes, I have spoken to my fellow LGBT+ brethren. This is a PSA from the majority of us. If only because I cannot speak for all South Africans. Some of us are assholes too. 

*** I know the UN wants to rename it “homophobic rape” but we will never us this term since it throws our Trans/NB/intersex/Bi/Ace/Aro/Agender/Questioning/Ally siblings under the bus. It frankly goes against what we invented it for. You, however, are welcome to coin the term yourselves. 

Take Your Gatekeeping and Shove It.

valeria2067:

So, this past weekend, I took my 11-year-old daughter to SuperCon to meet her favorite actor (and favorite Doctor), Peter Capaldi.

She wore a little blue TARDIS-decorated dress and some Doctor Who pins, and she nearly cried with joy when Capaldi greeted her for the photo op. He was a consummate gentleman and such a sweet and enthusiastic person.

An hour or so after the wonderful photo op experience, she and I were sitting at a table in the food court area.

A burly, older man plopped down nearby.  He looked at my little girl’s outfit, smiled, and said, “Do you even KNOW anything about Doctor Who?”

WTF, dude?

I was too stunned for a second to even respond, so he started right in with the ‘quizzing.’

“Who are the Doctor’s biggest enemies, and what planet does he come from?” this stranger asked.

Now I had moved past shocked and right into indignant/angry/protective mode.

“I don’t want her to be quizzed on something she loves, because I don’t want her thinking she has to prove ANYthing in order to be a fan,“ I told him.

Looking at my daughter, I said “You don’t owe strangers explanations or information, ok?“  She said OK and looked relieved.

Still he pressed on, patronizing grin and all: “Oh, I just want to be sure parents are raising their kids right.” Then he turned to my daughter again and asked “Who was the first Doctor, then?”

I cut him off right there. “No. I don’t want her quizzed. At all.”

Dude blinked in disbelief, sighed, and left about a minute later.

“Thanks,” my daughter said. “He was making me feel awkward.”

I held her hand and looked into her eyes. “Some men think they can have power over you by making you prove yourself. You never have to do it. They’re just insecure and pitiful, so they want to make you feel like it, too.  It’s not only about fan stuff, and it’s not always just men, but be careful not to fall into that trap, ok?”

That crap isn’t harmless fun. It sets up a pattern of approval-seeking, self-justification, self-doubt, and fear of exclusion that is very dangerous for children (particularly girls).

Fuck that.

TL;DR:  Do NOT come at me, my little girl, or anyone in my vicinity with your condescending, gatekeeping bullshit.

The next time, I won’t make the mistake of even TRYING to be polite.

Why does it matter that ace people belong to the lgbt+ community? I mean, as I understand it, them belonging does not hurt the rest of the community : as you said, they don’t really face the same oppression than the trans/gay/bi people so they’re not going to take “space” from them and i fail to ser why we should reject them ? They are not hetero so they don’t belong to the hetero community (if there could be such a thing, excuse my french) and they want to belong somewhere, what better 1/2

tiger-in-the-flightdeck:

hopelesslybenaddicted:

shag-me-senseless-watson:

addignisherlock:

melmey-fanfics:

watsonshoneybee:

plce than the lgbt community ? I get that they could create their own community, but there is strentgh in unity, i don’t really understand why people don’t want them? 2/2

 because cishet aro/ace people coming into the lgbt community does harm our community, for two reasons. 1) cishet aces that consider themselves lgbt take resources specifically earmarked for lgbt people, which is to say, specifically earmarked for people suffering from systematic oppression as a method of fighting back against that systematic oppression, which cishet aces don’t experience, and 2) cishet aces often have issues that are separate of lgbt issues or even in contradiction of lgbt issues, and lumping these issues in with ours creates confusion, weakens our position, and asks us to devote our advocacy to things that do not affect us and, in some cases, can even harm us (see specifically, historical desexualization of lgbt people and the “demonization” of lgbt sex). 

this isn’t a matter of having people to hang out with. it isn’t a matter of being cool enough to sit at our table. the lgbt community is engaged in a radical statement against institutionalized discrimination and systematic oppression, and our advocacy and our resources are committed to the specific and explicit fight against transphobia and homophobia. 

which cishet people, regardless of their relationship to sex and romance in their personal relationships, do not experience. 

Sorry, (not sorry) to be this frank, but this is
bullshit. Like saying cishet aces “often have issues that are separate of lgbt
issues or even in contradiction of lgbt issues” – What issues? What is LGBT? – For
me it is people that are discriminated because of their sexual orientation/identity.
That is the thing we all have in common. And discrimination comes in all kind
of forms and differ from society to society. And the issue is to fight this
discrimination in general. And a lot of issues are the same for aces as well as
for other LGBT people – corrective rape is an issue for lesbians and as well as
for asexual, being pathologized as a mentally ill is a problem for all LGBT
folk. So what are the issues aces face that are so different from LGBT issues
that you have in mind? Oh yes, cishet aces can marry even in countries in which
lesbians cannot and the can pass as “normal” (as can many bisexuals or gay sex-repulsed, aromantic men). How does it come that within the LGBT community some have this
idea of an Olympics of oppression that you need to win in order to “qualify”. Is a cishet ace part of the movement once they have survived corrective rape or when they have faced medical treatment for Hypoactive sexual desire disorder? 

And how does the
inclusion of aces weaken the position of LGBT positions? Is it not a general
LGBT position to fight against discrimination based on sexual orientation and
sexual identity? Look at the fights of the past – it helped the gay movement to
include lesbians and trans people because in the end when fighting marginalization
it is better to stand together than to fight against each other. Your position
is not only quite selfish but also shows a lack of understanding how advocacy
works. You think that “lumping these issues in with ours creates confusion,
weakens our position” – no, it is the opposite. Take a look at every social
movement of the past hundred years and you will learn that bundling issues and
bringing people together that face similar problems is what made social movements
successful, look at the labour movement or the women movements or even
environmental movements – numbers count, bringing people together counts,
fighting the general basis of a problem counts.

The idea
that “cishet aces that consider themselves lgbt take resources specifically
earmarked for lgbt people” is just laughable. Do they? How? And what resources? What I see is that
aces, even cishet aces, add resources to the fight against discrimination based
on sexual orientation as they speak out, as they show the world that there are
a number of sexual and romantic orientations, that heteronormativity and

amatonormativity is not the norm and that that diversity is natural and something normal and good. In your mind fighting against transphobia and homophobia
is the main reason for the LGBT movement and you fail to see that there is a
common idea behind that and that is the idea that only heterosexuality and with
it amatonormativity is the norm to which everyone has to conform to and
that idea is the problem – it isn’t whether chishet aces face the same
discrimination as gay man or whether bisexuals face the same problems as trans
people, it is the fact that they face problems because of their sexual
identity, their sexual orientation. And to fight that heterosexual norm we
should stand up together and not apart. 

And by the way, how the hell will the inclusion
of asexuals in the LGBT movement give anyone an argument to desexualize LGBT people?
I honestly have never come across that argument and the historical
desexualization cannot be linked to asexuality in any way. Have you any example where that happened?

There is a wonderful post I cannot find at the moment (but I will add it as soon as I find it. It is by an older gay man who remembered the evolvement of the movement and who remembers that at the beginning the gay movement wanted to exclude lesbians and trans people fearing that it will not help their aims and late the larger movement wanted to exclude the bisexuals (by the way with nearly the same arguments you just used) and that bit by bit that changed as well because numbers count, fighting the same enemy counts and seeing that there are more similarities than differences. In the end he urges young people in the movement to not forget this history and not to fight each other but to fight against the real problem. 

Thank you @melmey-fanfics 💜

It matters because they’re people and they’re relevant.

Thank you @melmey-fanfics. My sexuality doesn’t fit the het norm, I am not taking any of your “resources,” (not even sure what I’m supposed to be taking, tbh), and I recognize my privilege and use it to work toward recognition and acceptance of ALL under the LGBT+ umbrella. Enjoy your gatekeeping, OP.

Every time I see the term ‘cishet aces’ a I level up like fifty points in rage. An Asexual person is not ‘het’ because they are fucking asexual not heterosexual.

I am sick of this fucking argument. People who think this way are disgusting trash.

You know what? I don’t want to be in your ‘community’ I don’t want to be associated with gatekeeping people who want to stand on their soap boxes and shake their fists because ‘We’re more oppressed than you so you’re not allowed to sit at our table!’ It smacks of the nasty terf spread.

Just a few similarities: Pressure to engage in heterosexual relationships when they don’ t want them. Pressure to conform to societal ideals of happiness (which includes marriage and kids). Not to mention a similar lack of relevant information on sex and sexual identity. Did you know that huge numbers of asexual people just think they are broken? Just like other lgbtq people from conservative areas/families/religions think they are broken or wrong! Only now those other lgbtq kids might manage to see representation somehow in the media. The ace kids? They are still either being actively told they are broken/wrong or being patted on the head and told they’ll grow out of it or they just haven’t met The One yet. You know, exactly how tons of gay or bisexual people are told they are just “going through a phase” and they’ll grow out of it. We can and should support ace/aro folk and if they want to be part of the lgbtqia community they should be here. Gatekeeping sucks.