No, I think you’re misunderstanding. I take a very libertarian stance of LGBT issues.
You can do whatever you want with your life and body. Take hormone treatments, get surgery, cut your hair, change your name. I don’t care.
I just don’t think it’s right that I should be forced to call you a he when biology dictates that you are a she. That doesn’t mean I don’t think you should be alive. I just don’t believe that you are what you think you are.
You can be offended all you want, but when we get into the territory of legal ramifications for speech, I have a problem with that. There are plenty of people in this world willing to call you a he. If you don’t like me, disregard me and go find those people.
I don’t care what you do with your life and body. That is all 100% your choice. I just don’t want to be dragged into it against my will.
Biology doesn’t dictate pronouns.
Unless you’ve done a thorough medical evaluation including a hormone panel and chromosome analysis, every single pronoun you’ve ever used in your life has been your best guess. Or more likely, people tell you their pronouns and you take their word for it.
When you have to be ‘dragged into’ using correct pronouns for trans people but don’t check the ‘biology’ of people you assume are cis; your behavior is based on bigotry, not biology.
So you can double check, “Is it Ms, Miss, or Mrs?” but god fucking forbid you use correct pronouns. Like it is LITERALLY any skin off your bigotted nose if someone says, “Actually, I’m he/she/they.” You go, “Oh, k, sorry about that,” and go the fuck on with life. But oh NO, the GAYS REQUIRE ONE OUNCE OF RESPECT. IT CANNOT BE ABIDED. WE MUST PUT THEM IN THEIR PLACE BY USE OF BIOLOGY.
Which kindly go fuck yourself, considering how complex and misunderstood biology is. For fucks sake you ignorant ass.
“She says her name is Jennifer but I don’t beleive in Jennifers so I’m just gonna call her Tracy.”
It bothers me to see how many people are saying stuff like “I thought Bill Nye was supposed to be the science guy, he’s buying into this SJW cuck libtard stuff! Science says there are only two genders!” in response to Bill Nye covering gender and sexuality on Bill Nye Saves the World.
…Like, did they even listen to what he said? Have they read any peer-reviewed literature about the subject? Is their understanding of “gender” limited to a middle school understanding of X and Y chromosomes? Bill Nye addressed chromosomes, hormones, genitalia and secondary sex characteristics when talking about how some of us don’t fit into the male/female sex dichotomy, and brought up psychology and neuroscience when talking about gender and its difference from sex, and also sexuality. The actual science of sex, gender and sexuality across the animal kingdom and across human behaviour is far more interesting than “lol nope science says there are only two genders.”
It honestly makes me angry when people say “lol I thought this was about science” whenever a scientist says something about topics like gender, sexuality, climate change or evolution that annoys someone. You can’t just pretend science is on your side when your understanding of science is based on a grade school textbook.
Also, why is it only gender people seem to have a problem with? Yeah, basic school textbooks will talk about XX and XY chromosomes and the male and female reproductive system, but they’ll also talk about how humans have five fingers on each hand and how the eye works when everyone knows some humans are born with six fingers on each hand or born blind. Textbooks will talk about how our body metabolises fats, but nobody would say “lol no sorry science says otherwise” at someone (like one of my secondary school classmates) who had a rare disorder who couldn’t metabolise fats. We accept that sweeping statements about human biology are generalisations. Sure, there are limits – no humans have wings or feathers, that would go against science – but we all accept some level of human diversity outside the basic-level textbooks – diversity that’s described well in the advanced medical textbooks. So why is it people only apply this logic to gender and not other differences in human biology?
I think part of it could be the backlash against postmodern nonsense which suggests everything is opinion and science is no more objective than art, which is a blatantly anti-science attitude. But the idea that sex, gender and sexuality aren’t totally binary isn’t just postmodern gender theory, it’s actual science with empirical evidence to back it up.
He has a bachelor’s degree in science, he is barely qualified, and none if the stuff he said is backed up so 🙂
Bill Nye has a bachelor’s degree, sure. He’s not a scientist. He’s spent a lifetime studying and explaining science, though. To say he’s “barely qualified” is a bit of an insult to him, don’t you think? In any case, it’s irrelevant. Bill Nye isn’t an expert on the neuroscience or psychology of gender, and that’s not his job. He’s a science communicator – his job is to explain the science as best as he can and get people interested so they can look further into it. (Note that nobody calls Bill Nye “barely qualified” when he talks about non-controversial subjects like planetary science or chemistry, even though he isn’t an expert in those fields either.) So let’s see what the actual experts say, shall we?
Neurological basis for transgender identity, showing that certain brain structures that tend to vary in males and females tend to be correlated with someone’s gender identity rather than their biological sex:
Gizewski, E. R.; Krause, E.; Schlamann, M.; Happich, F.; Ladd, M. E.; Forsting, M.; Senf, W. (2009). “Specific cerebral activation due to visual erotic stimuli in male-to-female transsexuals compared with male and female controls: An fMRI study”. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 6: 440–448
Savic, I.; Arver, S. (2011). “Sex dimorphism of the brain in male-to-female transsexuals”. Cerebral Cortex. 21: 2525–2533
Rametti, G.; Carrillo, B.; Gómez-Gil, E.; Junque, C.; Zubiarre-Elorza, L.; Segovia, S.; Gomez, Á; Guillamon, A. (2011). “White matter microstructure in female to male transsexuals before cross-sex hormonal treatment. A diffusion tensor imaging study”. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 45: 199–204.
I’ve limited myself to scientific and medical sites here, but note also that the concept of gender (as opposed to sex) is deeply rooted in cultural ideas and even language as well as biological and psychological ones, so when it comes to gender, looking at culture and society is just as important as looking at science. And there we see that while every culture does link sex with gender and includes “male” and “female” gender categories, a great number of different cultures have had gender categories beyond that. That suggests that gender is linked to sex but by no means the same! You can find out more about that in the video I linked. (And no, I don’t think “attack helicopter” or “galaxy” is a real gender. But that doesn’t mean “non-binary,” “genderfluid” or “agender” isn’t, since those terms can be defined by their relation to being psychologically or culturally male or female. They’re “linked to sex, but not the same” as I described earlier.)
The vast majority of people fall close to one of two ends of the sex or gender spectrum, and there are good biological reasons for that. But it’s also an undisputed fact that various people do not fit exactly into the male or female sex category biologically and many more people don’t fit exactly into the male or female gender category psychologically. Just because these are a small minority of people doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Just because most of our physical or neurological traits cluster close to one end or another of the spectrum doesn’t mean the spectrum – and anyone in the middle of it – doesn’t exist.
Like I said earlier, any simple science textbook will tell you that humans have five fingers on each hand, but everyone knows that some humans are born with six fingers. When we say humans are one of two sexes and that sex matches a psychological phenomenon called gender, we understand that that applies to the majority of human individuals, the same way we understand that saying humans have five fingers on each hand or two kidneys does. Why is it that we can accept the existence of people whose number of fingers or kidneys or other details of their anatomy doesn’t match the average, yet people who don’t fit into the extreme ends of the sex or gender spectrum have their existence denied?
Beltainefaerie's Flights of Fancy 